AI Steering Committee 25-26

Our Vision
To serve as a consultative body that provides ethical guidance and strategic recommendations for AI use—ensuring students have access to developmentally appropriate learning, staff are supported by proper training, and the district adopts sustainable, environmentally-conscious tools for a thriving, AI-literate community.
Navigating the Future
AI is changing the way we learn, work, and create. To support our students and staff, we’ve developed a comprehensive guide—informed by DESE guidance and tailored for Holliston—to ensure AI is used responsibly, ethically, and effectively in our classrooms.
| Holliston | DESE (Department of Elementary & Secondary Education) |
Group 1- Curriculum & Student Literacy
Recommendations
- Students earn access to AI tools through demonstrated literacy and maturity.
- Grades 5 & 6 The Foundation
- Grades 7 & 8 Guided Practice (Using SIFT model)
- Grades 9 - 12 Independent Application
- Ethical Framework and Academic Integrity
- AI is an assistive technology but a human starts the process and performs a final review of the work
- AI Contract
- Develop a student AI contract that distinguishes between learning the skill and completing the task.
- Pilot Programs
- Platform controls such as Deledao to toggle Gemini on or off depending on the lesson.
- Professional Development
- Use People Power AI chart to train staff on the differences between LLM’s, Agents, and GPT’s.
- Humans in the Loop Ethics Class
- What is AI and how it works (CS/Stats focused), Privacy and Safety, Environmental Impact, Ownership of submission and busywork vs. learning.
Action Steps
- Administered faculty survey to Placentino Elementary, Miller Elementary School and Robert Adams Middle School (February 2026).
Group 2- Staff Literacy & Professional Development (PD)
Recommendations
- Professional Development
- Peer-to-Peer Support to sustain a collaborative learning environment.
- Training
- Foundational Knowledge - Launch a mandatory basic AI literacy training to establish a common baseline for all staff
- Accountability
- Mandate the use of school-owned google accounts for all AI work ; No personal or private AI accounts for school
- Establish a professional standard that all teacher generated content must be reviewed and finalized by the teacher
- Task Department heads with monitoring implementation and holding staff accountable for these standards during regular check-ins
- Recognizing that AI moves quickly, the committee suggests a multi-modal approach to ongoing education
- Supplement in-person meetings with webinars and e-learning for asynchronous growth
- Encourage Professional Learning Communities where teachers can share successes and troubleshoot
Action Steps
- Create a centralized digital hub to house webinars and e-learning for staff to access on demand.
Group 3- Guidance/AI Concerns
Recommendations:
- Policy, Governance & Privacy
- The focus is on establishing a legal and administrative "safety net" for the district before full enablement.
- AUP Updates: Revise the Acceptable Use Policy to explicitly define allowed vs. forbidden AI behaviors.
- Data Privacy First: Establish a "Privacy-First" mandate—absolutely no Personally Identifiable Information (PII) or Personal Health Information (PHI) is to be shared with AI tools.
- Action Step: Audit current handbooks to insert AI-specific governance and legal compliance language regarding Deepfake reporting and safeguarding.
- Instruction, Pedagogy & Cognitive Safety
- This group emphasizes protecting the "intellectual labor" of students and the professional integrity of staff.
- Supervised Access: Due to the lack of long-term research on AI’s impact on behavioral development (and risks like "jailbreaking" or harmful affirmation), AI should only be used under adult supervision.
- Action Step: Implement an Assignment Categorization System (Red/Yellow/Green) to give teachers autonomy over when AI is permitted.
- Ethics, Equity & Environmental Impact
- Bias Monitoring: Actively educate students on algorithmic bias and the "moment-in-time" nature of AI data scraping.
- Action Step: Research and license lower-impact AI models based on energy benchmarks (renewable sources/water consumption) to minimize the district's ecological footprint.
- Professional Standards
- Vetted Tools Only: Use only district-approved AI platforms (Gemini via school accounts). Do not use private accounts for school work.
- The "Personal Element": Maintain a Human-in-the-Loop standard. AI may assist with initial feedback, but you must provide the final assessment and personal touch.
- Privacy Mandate: Never input student PII or PHI into an AI prompt.
- Label Your Assignments: Use the Red/Yellow/Green system to clearly communicate AI expectations:
- Red: No AI allowed.
- Yellow: AI allowed for specific tasks (e.g., brainstorming).
- Green: Full AI integration encouraged.
- Safety & Vigilance
- Supervision: AI tools should be used by students only under direct teacher guidance to mitigate risks of "jailbreaking" or inappropriate content.
- Protect Your Growth
- The "CPU" Rule: Your brain is the "CPU." AI is just an external drive. If you let AI do the "intellectual labor" (outlines, conclusions, analysis), you are robbing yourself of the brain connections needed to solve future problems.
- Equity of Effort: You are responsible for the accuracy of your work. AI can be biased, outdated, or flat-out wrong. Always double-check facts against expert sources.
- Safety & Privacy
- Privacy Guardrails: Never tell an AI your full name, address, birthday, or any private health information. Once you type it, you lose control of it.
- S.H.I.E.L.D. against Deepfakes: Use the district's S.H.I.E.L.D. framework to respond to synthetic media or cyberbullying. If you see something suspicious, report it to a trusted adult immediately.
- Responsible Use
- Check the Label: Before starting an assignment, check if it is Red, Yellow, or Green. Using AI on a "Red" assignment is an academic integrity violation.
- Skepticism is a Superpower: AI aggregates the internet, including its biases and mistakes. Treat every AI answer with a "healthy dose of skepticism."
Group 3 - Revised Guidance Recommendations
## Staff Guidance: Professional Integrity & AIGoal: To empower educators while ensuring security and pedagogical rigor. I. Professional Standards
II. Instructional Practice
III. Safety & Vigilance
|
## Student Guidance: The "S.H.I.E.L.D." FrameworkGoal: To protect your learning, your privacy, and your community. I. Protect Your Growth
II. Safety & Privacy
III. Responsible Use
|
Steering Committee Members & Subgroups
23 members (Average meeting - 13 participants)
| Name | Stakeholder Group | Subcommittee Group |
|---|---|---|
| Dr. Joanne Menard | Administrator | |
| Dan MacLeod | Administrator | |
| Michael Koker | Parent/Guardian/Caregiver | Guidance/Concerns |
| Anne McGrath | Parent/Guardian/Caregiver | Guidance/Concerns |
| Xinshan Bai | Parent/Guardian/Caregiver | |
| Jessica Flynn | Parent/Guardian/Caregiver | |
| Alan Plante | Parent/Guardian/Caregiver | Guidance/Concerns |
| Chris Baribeau | Parent/Guardian/Caregiver | Staff Literacy & PD (Group Leader) |
| Mark McKnight | Parent/Guardian/Caregiver | Guidance/Concerns |
| Nat Vaughn | Parent/Guardian/Caregiver | |
| Aman Mehra | Parent/Guardian/Caregiver | |
|
Laura Gallerane |
Parent/Guardian/Caregiver | Curriculum & Student Literacy |
| Lisa Brown |
Parent/Guardian/Caregiver |
Curriculum & Student Literacy |
| Allie Curley | Staff | Curriculum & Student Literacy |
| Mudra Patel | Staff | |
| Jennifer White | Staff | Guidance/Concerns (Group Leader) |
| Karin Portocarrero -Heisler | Staff | Staff Literacy & PD |
| Kim Clifton | Staff | Curriculum & Student Literacy |
| Rohan Vijay | Student | Curriculum & Student Literacy |
| Frances Maija Andrade | Student | |
| Jackson Cutone | Student | Guidance/Concerns |
| Sam Giesecke | Student | Staff Literacy & PD |
| Isabella Yang | Student | |
